Author Topic: Health spending (or lack of it) and outcomes  (Read 627 times)

John Short

  • Global Moderator
  • PFM Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 558
Health spending (or lack of it) and outcomes
« on: April 27, 2023, 07:23:41 GMT »
Interesting report linking health spending (or lack of it) to outcomes related to employment, inequality and GDP.

https://www.ippr.org/research/publications/health-and-prosperity

https://www.ippr.org/files/2022-04/health-and-prosperity-april22.pdf

Summary
The hidden personal cost of UK long-term sickness that cries out for a new national health mission
•   New health conditions cost people up to £2,200 on average from annual earnings – others in household also badly affected
•   Sickness is a key factor in around half of people leaving work
•   Better health would benefit economic prospects for all, but could boost women’s earnings twice as much as men’s
•   UK should aim to become the healthiest country in the world within 30 years, says IPPR Commission on Health and Prosperity
The UK’s poor record on health is taking a huge toll on people’s personal finances and job prospects, a landmark report of the IPPR Commission on Health and Prosperity exposes today.
The onset of illness costs people up to £2,200 of their annual earnings, according to an IPPR study of the most recent seven years of panel data from the UK Household Longitudinal Study. The data span five years before the pandemic broke out, and the first two since it began in early 2020. Researchers found that:
•   Someone with a new physical illness experienced on average a fall of around £1,800 in their annual earnings, before the pandemic. 
•   In the same period, those with a new mental illness faced an average fall in annual earnings of around £2,200.
•   Since 2020, someone with a new chronic physical illness experienced on average a £1,400 annual earnings fall, while the onset of a mental illness has meant an average annual earnings fall of around £1,700.
They also found that the onset of chronic illness since 2020 has also had an impact on others living in the same household as the newly unwell person, with their annual earnings falling by around £1,200 on average.
The study of the cost of poor health on employment and earnings is among the most ambitious ever undertaken.
It found that loss of earnings following sickness was driven by factors including people leaving their job, working fewer hours, or not returning to work when they might have done so if in better health. These are additional to other costs of sickness, such as paying for healthcare, increased energy usage, or the cost of travel to appointments.
For many, these costs prove life changing. Among those diagnosed with a long-term illness since the pandemic, two in five lost 10 per cent or more of their earnings. Chronic physical conditions are estimated to have driven 700,000 people to leave employment in the same period, forgoing all their earned income.
Job loss was the biggest driver of lost earnings. The report found that poor health was a factor for more than half those who left their jobs (56 per cent) before the pandemic, with a larger impact since. Among older adults, poor health often led to early retirement.
The report also found that people with lower incomes are likely to be worse affected by becoming ill. Following the onset of a chronic illness, around one in six of those already in the lowest income quartile left employment during the pandemic, compared to around one in 20 of those in the highest quartile.
This unequal impact is compounded by the fact that people on low incomes are more likely to experience sickness, and less likely to get the best possible care.
It found that the impact of lost income is also unequal by gender, region and ethnicity in the UK. According to a new analysis applied by IPPR, improvements in people’s health would have different impacts on the earnings of different groups. It found that:
•   Better health would improve the incomes of all women as a group at twice the rate of men
•   Levelling-up on health gaps would increase regional earnings most in Wales, the West Midlands and the North East
•   Workers from Bangladeshi or Pakistani backgrounds would benefit financially the most from better health
Much sickness in the UK is preventable – through better housing, better jobs, action on public health challenges like obesity, or access to the best treatments and social care. Yet UK governments have systematically failed to pull the right levers over the last three decades, the report says.
The IPPR Commission on Health and Prosperity – with commissioners including Lord Ara Darzi, Dame Sally Davies, Mayor Andy Burnham, Sir Oliver Letwin and Dr Halima Begum - challenges the government to do better on raising overall national health, and as a result to reap the wide economic benefits.
It calls for a new Health and Prosperity Act, modelled on the 2008 Climate Change Act. This would hardwire two ambitious new missions in law:
•   To make the UK the healthiest country in the world within 30 years;
•   To increase healthy life expectancy to beyond the state retirement age across every region.
Taken together, the report says, these could serve as a health equivalent of ‘net zero’.
As it stands, the UK has both a lower healthy life expectancy and a lower rate of improvement in healthy life expectancy than other high-income countries.


John Short

  • Global Moderator
  • PFM Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 558
Re: Health spending (or lack of it) and outcomes
« Reply #1 on: February 05, 2024, 10:34:15 GMT »
Continuing the theme which shows the impact of lack of focus on health outcomes by parents and society as well as policy makers.

The Academy for Medical Sciences has recently released a report that sheds light on critical issues affecting health in the United Kingdom.  Experts have expressed deep concern over the deteriorating health of children under the age of five in the UK. Alarming trends include:
•   Obesity: More than 20% of children aged five are overweight or obese.
•   Tooth Decay: Nearly 25% of five-year-olds in England suffer from tooth decay.
•   Infant Mortality: Between 2014 and 2017, there was an increase in infant mortality in England, disproportionately affecting the most economically deprived areas.
•   Global Ranking: The UK ranks 30th out of 49 OECD countries for infant mortality.
•   Vaccination Rates: There has been a decrease in the proportion of children receiving vaccinations.

The report is not on the Academy website but more can be found at:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p0h91x92
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2024/feb/05/experts-lament-appalling-decline-in-health-of-under-fives-in-uk


 

RSS | Mobile

© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF